
The reviews highlight a significant contrast between the table''s aesthetic appeal and its structural integrity. While frequently lauded for its attractive design, ease of assembly, and perceived value, numerous reports of breakage, damage, and instability raise serious concerns about its durability and quality control. The conflicting feedback suggests potential variations in manufacturing processes or materials, leading to inconsistent product performance. The reported weight limit of 8kg, coupled with accounts of damage under minimal load, suggests limitations in its practical functionality, particularly in households with children. The susceptibility to surface damage, including scratches and watermarks, further points to vulnerabilities in the materials or finish. The recurrent issues with leg stability indicate potential design flaws within the leg attachment mechanism. The table''s suitability for families with children is explicitly questioned in several reviews. The overall assessment suggests that the table might be better suited for decorative or light use rather than as a robust coffee table. The accuracy of the product description is also questionable. The small size, while suitable for some, is also a recurring point of feedback.