JYSK TABURE NEBLE Ø50 BEŽ PLETENA TKANINA

Pros

• Comfortable: Commonly described as comfortable to sit on, also suitable as a footrest. Easily restores its shape after light use (tapping the sides). Suitable for occasional seating. One review notes that prolonged sitting with legs extended can cause knee discomfort. Multiple reviews describe it as comfortable and suitable for children.
• Aesthetically pleasing: Frequently praised for its attractive appearance and suitability as a decorative item. Described as stylish, tasteful, discreet, and fitting well in various interior styles. Many reviewers find it visually appealing.
• Practical and versatile: Can be used as a footrest, seat (for occasional use), or decorative element. Its compact size allows easy storage and movement. Many users find it suitable for multiple purposes.
• Good value for money: Considered good quality for its price (one review mentioned a price equivalent to approximately €30). One review mentioned purchasing it on sale, increasing satisfaction. Another review considers it expensive for its quality, suggesting a fair price around €60-€80. Several reviewers highlight its value for money.

Cons

• Durability issues: Several reviews report the puff collapsing or losing its shape after relatively short periods of use, even with moderate weight. The filling material is described as poor quality in several reviews; one user reported losing half the puff''s height after minimal use, another reported the filling material spilling out, and another reported the filling material causing a safety hazard requiring an emergency room visit. The filling is described as "unstable" by one reviewer, collapsing after a single use by an 80kg person. Multiple reports of seams ripping and filling material escaping. One user reports the puff breaking after a single sitting. Another user reports the puff losing its shape after only two days. One review mentions polystyrene balls as filling material, which began to fall out. Another review notes that the shape is lost in a few days and the puff is too soft.
• Size: Some users found the puff smaller or lower than expected.
• Filling material: The filling material is described as polyester balls and polystyrene balls, and its texture is reported as slightly rustling when squeezed by one reviewer. The filling is frequently mentioned as a source of the puff''s instability and eventual collapse. Several reports of filling material spilling out.
• Cover: The cover is not removable, making cleaning difficult. One reviewer described the cover as thin.

Comments

The reviews highlight a significant discrepancy in the puff''s durability and longevity, heavily influenced by usage frequency and weight. While many find it aesthetically pleasing and comfortable for occasional use as a footrest or decorative element, reports of structural failure and safety concerns related to the filling material are frequent and significant. The puff''s suitability as a seating option, particularly for heavier individuals or frequent use, is strongly questioned. The color is generally described as a neutral, milky beige, although one review hopes for more color options in the future. The puff''s suitability as a primary seating option is not recommended. The price seems a source of contention, with some finding it reasonable, and others considering it too expensive for its quality and durability. Cleaning the puff presents a challenge due to the non-removable cover. The filling material appears to be a major factor influencing the puff''s durability and overall satisfaction.