JYSK TRPEZARIJSKA STOLICA KASTRUP BIJELA/HRAST

Pros

• Comfort: Commonly mentioned as comfortable and easy to sit in. Reviewers frequently describe them as comfortable and stable, even after years of daily use. The chairs are described as supportive of the back, and "hugging" the sitter. One review specifically noted the seat''s suitability for someone 169 cm tall, with legs at a right angle and no thigh pressure. Another mentions the comfort is due to the built-in soft seat. Multiple reviews praise the comfort and elegance of the chairs. Reviewers frequently describe the chairs as comfortable and aesthetically pleasing. Reviewers describe the chairs as comfortable even for longer periods of sitting. The seat is described as soft. Multiple reviews describe the chairs as comfortable and visually appealing. Reviewers describe them as comfortable and suitable for children. Reviewers describe them as comfortable, stylish, and easy to clean. Many reviewers describe the chairs as surprisingly comfortable. One reviewer noted the comfort even after a full day/evening of use. Multiple reviews praise the comfort and ease of use. Several reviews describe the chairs as comfortable and aesthetically pleasing.
• Ease of Assembly: Frequently praised for being easy and quick to assemble. Instructions are described as clear and easy to follow. Assembly is described as taking only a few moments, even for a 13-year-old child. Assembly is described as simple and quick. Assembly is described as easy, even for someone assembling alone. Assembly is described as quick and easy, even for those unfamiliar with assembly. Assembly is described as simple and fast. Multiple reviews highlight ease of assembly. However, some reviews report difficulty with assembly due to screws not fitting properly.
• Easy to Clean: White chairs are specifically mentioned as easy to clean, though crumbs can get stuck between the cushion and the chair. A damp cloth is sufficient for cleaning; a magic sponge is also recommended. Crumbs can be removed with a toothbrush. The faux leather is described as easy to clean, although some report staining issues. Multiple reviewers praise the ease of cleaning. The chairs are described as easy to maintain even with young children. One review mentions ease of cleaning and nice materials.
• Good Value for Money: Many reviewers highlighted the excellent price-to-quality ratio, especially those who purchased them on sale (prices mentioned range from €25 to €35). One reviewer noted that even at a low sale price the quality is good. Another reviewer considered it good value even at the non-sale price. Multiple reviews highlight the chair''s value for money, especially at sale prices. Many reviewers find the chairs to be good value for the money, especially when purchased on sale. Multiple reviews mention excellent value for money. Several reviewers consider them good value for the money.
• Attractive Design: Described as beautiful, pretty, stylish, modern, and elegant. They are said to complement various interior styles. Reviewers frequently describe the chairs as aesthetically pleasing. The design is described as sleek and modern. Reviewers describe the chairs as visually appealing and fitting various interior styles. The chairs are frequently described as beautiful and elegant. Multiple reviews praise the attractive design. Reviewers describe the chairs as stylish and suitable for use with sheepskins.
• Sturdiness/Stability: Described as sturdy, stable, strong, and robust by many. Chairs are described as remaining strong and stable after a year of use. However, some reviews report instability due to uneven leg lengths. The legs are described as made of sturdy wood. The chairs are described as sturdy and stable. One review notes the strong legs and minimal chance of floor damage.
• Lightweight: One reviewer specifically appreciated the chair''s light weight.

Cons

• Faux Leather Durability: Reports of faux leather cracking and becoming difficult to clean after 3-4 months of use (one review mentioned this happening even without direct sunlight exposure). Another review mentioned the loss of the sponge in the seat after a year. One review notes staining issues, which were not removable. Concerns exist about staining, especially with white cushions. One review suggests using protective pads to prevent premature wear on the faux leather. One review mentioned folding of the faux leather after only four days of use. Significant staining and cracking are reported even after short use, rendering cleaning difficult. The faux leather is described as poor quality, easily staining and cracking. One review notes permanent staining after only two months of use, even with water-based products. The faux leather is described as not easily cleanable. A leg broke after only a month and a half of minimal use. Multiple reviews report significant durability issues with the faux leather. The faux leather readily absorbs food coloring, resulting in permanent stains.
• Unpadded Backrest: One review noted the backrest is slightly hard due to a lack of padding, although this could be mitigated with a cushion.
• Potential for Breakage: Several reviews reported chairs arriving with defects, including broken or defective hardware (screws, legs, and attachments) requiring replacement or repair. One review mentioned a chair breaking after a year of use, even though the user''s weight was under the stated limit. Another notes the chairs are not suitable for leaning back on. One review received chairs with pre-existing screw holes and rust. Another review mentions that the legs easily come loose after a couple of months of use, due to faulty screws. Several reviews mention issues with screw holes being misaligned or stripped. Bolts are frequently reported as being of poor quality and stripping easily. One review reported a broken leg after four years of use. One chair arrived with a screw hole that prevented a screw from passing through. Plastic bends when someone leans back. One review mentions uneven leg lengths impacting stability. Legs can break. Multiple reports of broken legs and defective hardware. One review mentions a chair leg breaking under an 85kg user. Multiple reviews mention significant issues with hardware quality, including broken and missing parts. Multiple reviews report broken legs and other structural failures.
• White Cushions Not Replaceable: One reviewer expressed concern about the non-replaceable white cushions potentially staining easily with use. Another expressed concern about the longevity of the cushions. White cushions are prone to staining that is difficult to remove.
• Loose Foot Pads: One review mentioned that the included foot pads come loose quickly.
• Defective Hardware: Multiple reviews reported receiving some defective screws or other hardware that needed replacing or repair. One reviewer received chairs with mismatched legs. Some screws had poor threads requiring replacement. Several reviews reported receiving chairs with defective or missing parts.
• Crumbs: Crumbs can get stuck between the cushion and the chair, making cleaning difficult.
• Leg Space: One review noted that the legs take up a significant amount of space due to their shape. The legs are described as being too wide for some tables.
• Color Discrepancy: One review noted a color discrepancy between the description and the actual product received.
• Weight Capacity: One review suggests the chairs may not be suitable for heavier individuals.
• Uneven Leg Length: One review reported receiving a chair with legs of different lengths. One review notes that while some leg length discrepancy can be addressed with included pads, there was an issue with inconsistent leg coloring.
• Dust and Debris Accumulation: Dust, crumbs, and other debris can accumulate inside the chair.
• Strong Odor: One review reported a strong, sweet odor that persisted even after cleaning.
• Screw Quality: Screws are frequently reported as being of poor quality and stripping easily.
• Slippery on Hard Floors: One review mentioned that the chairs slide easily on hard floors, requiring placement on a rug or mat.

Comments

The reviews suggest that the Kastrup chair offers good value for money, especially at lower sale prices. However, the durability of the faux leather version, and the quality control regarding hardware, are significant concerns, with multiple reports of cracking, deterioration, and defective parts within a relatively short time frame. The easy assembly and cleaning are consistently praised positive points. The long-term durability is uncertain, with both positive and negative reports from long-term users. The prevalence of issues with defective hardware suggests significant potential quality control problems. One review noted a color discrepancy between the description and the actual product received. The white color, while aesthetically pleasing to many, is also frequently mentioned as being prone to staining. The overall experience appears to depend heavily on the quality control of the individual chair received. Some chairs wobble slightly and require adjustment or additional foot pads. Crumbs getting stuck between the seat and the frame is a commonly mentioned issue. The accumulation of dust and debris inside the chair is also a recurring problem. A strong, persistent odor is reported in one review. The inconsistent quality across different chairs is a significant concern. Many positive reviews mention purchasing on sale; this suggests that the value is highly dependent on price. Despite some issues, many reviewers express overall satisfaction with the chair''s comfort and style. The chairs may not be suitable for heavier individuals, or those who lean back in their chairs. Some users reported that the chairs are prone to sliding on hard floors. Assembly issues are reported by some users.