JYSK TRPEZARIJSKA STOLICA KOKKEDAL SIVA/HRAST

Pros

• Design: Commonly described as modern, attractive, and elegant. Many reviewers find the chairs aesthetically pleasing, even more so than in the product photos. Often praised for their stylish appearance and suitability for Scandinavian-style interiors. Reviewers frequently use terms like "lovely," "delightful," and "elegant" to describe their appearance.
• Comfort: Frequently praised for comfort and described as comfortable, soft, and ergonomic. Reviewers frequently use terms like "lovely," "delightful," "cozy," "comfortable as an armchair," "soft," and "comfortable" to describe the seating experience. Many describe the chairs as comfortable enough for extended use. Several reviewers highlight their suitability for extended periods of sitting. One review mentioned that after a year of daily use, the chairs remained comfortable and showed no signs of significant wear. Another user noted that even after a year of use, the padding did not show significant sagging. Many reviewers describe them as "excellent" for sitting.
• Quality: Often praised for their perceived high quality and sturdy construction. Many report that the chairs appear well-made and durable. Multiple reviewers describe easy cleaning and maintenance of the material. Some users report continued use for over two and a half years with no issues. The material is described as high-quality and dense (in some cases).
• Ease of Assembly: Assembly is frequently described as easy and quick. Many reviewers specifically mention the simple installation of the legs. Adjustable feet are mentioned as a feature that improves stability. Assembly is described as "easy" and "relatively easy."
• Stability (most units): Most reviews highlight the stability of the chairs, even under significant weight (up to 100 kg). Metal legs, designed to mimic wood, are noted for their contribution to stability. After six months of use, one reviewer reported no issues with the legs spreading apart. Chairs are described as "sturdy" and "supportive."
• Value for Money: Many reviewers emphasize the excellent value for the price. Several reviews mention the chairs being a good value even at full price. One reviewer purchased a chair for €35. Another reviewer noted good value for €40 with a discount. Chairs are described as "affordable," "good value," and "priceworthy."

Cons

• Durability (some units): Significant variability in durability is reported. Some chairs showed signs of wear (holes in the seat) after only a few days of use. Others have experienced significant structural issues; some chairs broke under the weight of a person weighing 90-100 kg. Several users described the legs as unstable and prone to breaking under light weight, with loose screws leading to a separation of the seat and legs. One reported receiving a chair with one leg too short. Sagging padding is frequently noted even after a short period of use. In some instances, the back separated from the seat. The padding is reported to deform quickly in some instances. Legs are noted to spread apart, especially on wooden floors. Some report legs of uneven length. Two chairs broke within four weeks of use for a 94 kg user. The base material is described as low-quality wood prone to cracking and breaking. Padding is reported to become significantly less firm after a short period of use, even with a user weighing only 75kg. One review mentioned the padding making a squeaking sound, suggestive of low-quality padding. Padding is reported to show significant sagging after only two weeks of use. One review mentioned the chair creaking simply by looking at it. One chair had a broken plastic joint in the leg. One chair was received with a missing rubber foot on a leg.
• Stability (some units): Some reviewers reported instability with legs spreading out and the back leaning back. This is attributed to the non-monolithic design of the seat and back. The legs are described as weak, especially for heavier users. Some chairs wobble even when unoccupied. One chair wobbled due to incorrectly affixed legs. Felt pads under the legs are reported to fall off, leading to floor scratches. Noisy legs are also reported. One chair had one leg that did not touch the floor.
• Color Accuracy: The actual color is reported to be significantly darker than depicted in product photos (dark grey instead of the expected color). Color inconsistencies are reported with some chairs exhibiting yellowish or greenish tints. A slightly lighter grey than pictured is also reported. Color variations within a single order are reported.
• Leg Placement: One reviewer described an issue where the leg placement caused them to hit their legs on the legs of the chair.
• Size: One review mentioned the chair being too small, even for a person of average size (180 cm, 75 kg). Another review mentioned the seat being too small for a tall adult male.
• Missing Parts: One review mentioned receiving a chair with a missing screw. One review mentioned receiving a chair with one leg too short. One chair was received with a missing rubber foot on a leg.

Comments

The reviews reveal considerable inconsistency in the quality of the chairs. Some customers report high satisfaction with durable, comfortable chairs, while others experienced significant structural defects and instability even after minimal use. The instability and structural failures are a particular concern, suggesting potential quality control issues. The variability in color and the reported issues with leg length, assembly, and size further highlight these problems. The overall experience seems highly dependent on receiving a chair free from manufacturing flaws. The metal legs, while contributing to the chair''s style, appear to be a source of instability in several reported cases. Tightening screws while seated is suggested to improve stability. The low-quality wood used in the base is a major contributing factor to the structural failures reported. The quality of the padding is also inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid deformation and sagging. The quality of the padding appears to be a significant factor influencing long-term comfort and durability. A significant number of reviews highlight issues with the stability and durability of the chairs, indicating potential widespread quality control problems. The discrepancy between positive and negative reviews suggests a significant degree of manufacturing inconsistency. The metal legs, while aesthetically pleasing, appear to be a significant source of instability and breakage issues. The plastic feet are also reported to be prone to breakage.