JYSK TRPEZARIJSKA STOLICA TYLSTRUP BOROVINA

Pros

• Easy assembly (very commonly mentioned). Reviewers consistently highlight the ease of assembly, even without specialized tools.
• Lightweight (very commonly mentioned). Described as light, easy to move.
• Aesthetically pleasing (very commonly mentioned); described as beautiful, nice-looking, and matching existing furniture. Many find the simple design appealing. Described as stylish and elegant. Matches existing pine furniture well. Minimalist and classic design.
• Stable and sturdy (frequently mentioned). Reviewers emphasize the chairs'' stability and strength despite their lightweight nature. However, stability may decrease after extended use (over 2 years). Described as firm and resistant. Some report long-term durability (5+ years).
• Comfortable (frequently mentioned). Several reviewers note the chairs'' comfort, although some suggest adding a cushion for increased comfort. One review notes an uncomfortable seat which is not deeply recessed. Some find them comfortable enough without cushions. Comfortable even for older children. Ergonomic design mentioned once.
• Good value for money (frequently mentioned). One user purchased six chairs for €177. The price is frequently cited as a major positive. Described as inexpensive and good value for the price.
• Good quality for the price (mentioned several times). This is often noted in relation to the low cost. However, significant quality issues are also reported (see Cons).

Cons

• Pre-drilled holes missing or insufficient (very frequently mentioned). Some chairs arrived with missing or incorrectly sized pre-drilled holes, requiring additional drilling or adjustments. In some cases, the holes were completely missing, rendering assembly impossible without additional tools and effort. Holes described as looking like they were shot from a Kalashnikov.
• Damaged parts upon arrival (frequently mentioned). Issues included chipped/damaged backrests, cracked seat parts, and gaps between seat and frame. Damage was severe enough in some cases to require replacement of parts or reassembly with different materials. Glue marks and scratches are frequently mentioned. Soft pine wood is susceptible to damage.
• Inconsistent wood finishing. Some chairs had rough or unfinished areas. Some chairs showed excessive knots in the wood. The wood finishing is described as basic and may require additional finishing. One review mentions that the wood appears to be glued together from smaller pieces, and color inconsistencies were noted in some instances. Wood described as soft and prone to breaking at joints. Some parts may require additional paint. Wood darkens with time.
• Poor quality control (very frequently mentioned). Significant quality issues, including damaged parts and manufacturing inaccuracies, are reported across numerous reviews. One user reported factory connections failing after a month of moderate use. Four chairs reportedly fell apart within five years of use. The inconsistency in quality is a recurring theme. Chairs described as delicate and unsuitable for adults, only suitable for children sitting. One chair broke after six months of daily use.
• Dimensional inconsistencies (mentioned). One review noted a 4cm discrepancy in metal parts compared to the wood, and a significant gap (up to 3cm) on one side of the seat on multiple chairs. Leg lengths are inconsistent in some chairs.
• Short screws (mentioned). At least one review mentioned that the screws provided for attaching the seat were too short.
• Missing parts (mentioned). At least one review reported a missing part necessary for assembly.
• Color inconsistencies (mentioned). One review reported receiving a mix of light and dark chairs when only light chairs were ordered. Another review noted inconsistencies in color between different parts of the chair. Significant color differences noted between newer and older chairs.
• Missing screw covers (mentioned). At least one review mentions missing screw covers.
• Short Allen key (mentioned). At least one review mentions the provided Allen key is too short.

Comments

The significant number of positive reviews highlighting ease of assembly, lightweight design, aesthetics, and value for money are countered by a substantial number of negative reviews detailing pervasive quality control issues. These issues include missing or poorly placed pre-drilled holes, damaged parts, inconsistent finishing, dimensional inaccuracies, missing parts, missing screw covers, and short Allen key, and color inconsistencies in multi-chair orders. The variation in reported experiences suggests significant inconsistencies in the quality of chairs produced. While many users report satisfaction, some report defects requiring additional work, repair, or even replacement of parts to assemble and use the chairs. The reported ease of assembly, however, might allow some customers to easily address minor defects encountered. Some reviewers noted difficulty assembling the chair due to its arrival in small parts or due to significant manufacturing flaws requiring the use of additional tools and materials. The frequency of reported problems with pre-drilled holes points to a major manufacturing defect. The soft pine wood seems susceptible to damage during transport and requires careful handling. The long-term durability appears questionable, with some reporting instability after two years of use and some reporting needing repainting after seven years. One user noted that some parts feel slightly wobbly. Despite some assembly difficulties, the overall sentiment regarding assembly is positive due to the chair’s simple design. Some reviewers suggest using wood glue to improve joint strength. Some reviewers suggest purchasing additional cushions for enhanced comfort. One reviewer noted that the chairs are suitable for vigorous use by children (including climbing). One year after purchase, one user reported that the chair was suitable for firewood.