JYSK KREVET NA SPRAT VESTERVIG 80/120X200 SA LJESTVAMA BIJELA

Pros

• Sturdy construction: Commonly mentioned as "sturdy," "solid," "strong," "massive," "robust," "stable," and "well-built." The bed is described as not creaking.
• Easy assembly (generally): Many reviewers found assembly easy, thanks to numbered parts and clear instructions. Several mention the instructions were helpful and the numbered parts made assembly straightforward. Assembly time reported as approximately one hour in one review, and 2.5 hours in another. Some describe assembly as "easy" or "simple."
• Good value for money: Frequently praised for its good price-performance ratio. One review mentioned a price of approximately €350.
• Compact design (for the lower bed): The 120cm version is specifically praised for being less bulky than a 140cm bunk bed.
• Suitable for families: Reviewers highlight its suitability for families, particularly those with multiple children. Two children can sleep comfortably on the lower bunk, according to one review.
• Aesthetically pleasing: Described as "beautiful," "nice," "pretty," "elegant," and "stylish."

Cons

• Assembly difficulties (some reports): While generally easy, some reviewers reported significant challenges with assembly, citing mislabeled parts (numbers 21/22 and 25/26 were commonly mentioned as mislabeled), missing parts (one reviewer reported a missing main part and missing screws, another a missing lower bed support), and difficulties fitting parts due to inaccurate pre-drilling. One reviewer stated it took six hours to assemble. Pre-drilling is recommended by some reviewers to prevent wood splitting. Some parts were reported to be cracked or poorly finished upon arrival. Incorrectly sized slats (too long) requiring cutting and re-drilling were reported. In one case, two identical legs were included, necessitating the drilling of additional holes. One review mentioned a missing side panel on the lower bunk. Multiple reports of missing or incorrect parts were received, ranging from missing screws and main structural components to extra boards and missing boards with misaligned holes, making assembly impossible. Reports of broken boards upon arrival or after short use are also noted.
• Wood quality (some reports): Some reviewers noted issues with the wood quality, including knots, cracks, warped parts, and a single-layer paint finish that revealed the wood underneath. Some wood cracking during assembly and cracks appearing after two months of use were reported.
• Instructions (some reports): Some noted that the instructions could be unclear or incorrect at certain points, while others found them very helpful.
• Height (multiple reports): Multiple reviewers wished the bed were taller to increase the space between the beds.
• Finishing (multiple reports): The paint finish is criticized as thin, revealing wood underneath, and having a strong turpentine odor requiring a month or more to dissipate. Sharp metal edges under the mattress are also mentioned as a safety concern. Some slats were also reported to exude sap.

Comments

The bunk bed''s assembly remains the most divisive aspect. While many found it straightforward, others experienced substantial difficulties due to mislabeled or missing parts and/or wood quality issues. The discrepancy suggests potential quality control problems. Several reviewers mentioned the need for pre-drilling to prevent wood splitting. A rubber mallet was also suggested by some reviewers. The reported prices vary, with one review indicating approximately €350. One reviewer noted that the ladder can be assembled on either the left or right side, raising questions about whether the instructions clarified this ambiguity. A concern about the bed''s origin (Made in Belarus) was also mentioned. The quality of the included Allen wrench was criticized in one review, described as too soft for the assembly task. One review mentioned that the paint is thin, revealing the wood underneath in places. The number of screws included is noted as excessive in one review. One reviewer noted that a standard 80cm mattress did not fit the upper bunk due to the ladder''s encroachment. Concerns were raised about the lack of adequate safety features (e.g., fall protection) for children.