JYSK STALAK ZA ODJEĆU GUDME DUPLI CRNA/HROM

Pros

• Easy assembly: Frequently mentioned; assembly is often quick (5-10 minutes). Some users report needing a rubber mallet for a tight fit. One user assembled it with an 11-year-old child. At least one user reported needing two people for assembly.
• Good value for money (especially on sale): Frequently highlighted, particularly when purchased at a discounted price. Multiple reviewers indicate this is a good value for the money.
• Convenient wheels/mobility: Allows for easy movement.
• Includes a bottom shelf: Useful for storing shoes or other items. The shelf is noted as detaching easily; some users glue it for stability.
• Compact and convenient: Suitable for smaller spaces. Frequently mentioned as a space-saving solution, particularly in smaller rooms.
• Versatile: Used as both a clothes rack and drying rack; at least one user reports using it for hanging plants. Used to hang both clothes and bedding. Used for storing shoes, jackets, and bags. Used for displaying products in a shop. Used for storing winter coats.
• Aesthetically pleasing: Described as "nice," "attractive," "stylish," and "neat" in some reviews.
• Adjustable height: Allows for customized placement of clothing bars. However, the mechanism is reported as unreliable by some, with bars only staying at the minimum height for some users. Some users report difficulty adjusting the height. At least one user experienced failure of a height adjustment mechanism component preventing height adjustment. One user highly values the height adjustment feature.
• Holds a significant amount of clothing: Multiple reviewers mention the capacity to hold many clothes. One user reported using it for over a year without issue. Several users report successfully hanging multiple heavy items such as jackets, though this is disputed by other reviews. One user reports it holding all the clothes from two wardrobes. Many users describe it as "sturdy," "strong," and "massív". One user reports a weight capacity of 15kg per bar. At least one user reports it holding a significant amount of clothing without instability.
• Suitable for multiple units: At least one user placed three units side-by-side. Another user owns two. At least one user owns six.
• Spacious: Described as spacious and easy to find clothes. Allows for easy organization of clothes.

Cons

• Instability and fragility: A major recurring issue; prone to collapsing or bending under moderate weight. Plastic connectors are a frequent point of failure. Some users report reinforcing with cable ties or tape. The product''s durability is questionable, with reports of it breaking within minutes of assembly. Many users report instability, even with lighter loads. At least one user reported the plastic cracking after two weeks of use; another reports deformation and cracking after a year. One user reports instability even with light loads. One user rated the product as very weak and unstable. The rack collapses under approximately 5kg of weight according to one user. The product is described as flimsy and plastic by multiple users. One user reports the rack bending when moving clothes. Another user reports damage to their television caused by a falling clothes rack. A user reported receiving two damaged products out of two ordered. At least one user reported the product arrived warped and unusable, with broken plastic components. A user reports the rack tilting significantly under moderate weight. One user reports the rack falling apart and being very unstable. The product is described as not sturdy enough and falling apart. One user reports instability with a significant amount of clothing. The rack wobbles from side to side under moderate weight, requiring anchoring to the wall for stability, according to one user. The product is described as unstable with heavier items. At least one user describes the rack as slightly unstable. The product is described as weak and unstable.
• Insufficient space between bars: Close proximity of bars renders one bar almost unusable. This limits the number of clothes that can be hung, even if the rack itself can hold a lot of weight. The closeness of the two bars makes efficient use of both difficult. This is a recurring issue, limiting the number of clothes that can be hung effectively. The narrow distance between the bars is a frequently mentioned limitation. One user wishes the bars were wider apart. Clothes on both bars collide, making it difficult to access clothing.
• Low weight capacity: Unsuitable for heavier items like jackets or coats; even a small number of garments can cause instability. Plastic construction contributes to this. A maximum weight of 15kg is mentioned, but frequently exceeded. The reported ability to hold heavier items is not consistent across reviews. The manufacturer states a 15kg capacity per bar and 10kg for the bottom shelf.
• Bottom shelf detaches easily: Bottom shelf frequently falls off, especially when moving the rack. Some users glue it for stability. The bottom shelf is reported to frequently fall off, even with minor loads.
• Bars slide down: Bars are prone to slipping down due to weak locking mechanisms. The locking mechanism is reported as failing on at least one occasion, causing the bar to slide down. Users report needing to firmly tighten the adjustment.
• Top bar renders lower bar unusable: Top bar interferes with the use of the lower bar, limiting usable space.
• Fragile plastic components: Several reviewers note the fragility of the plastic components, leading to breakage under normal use.
• Instability with heavier items: The rack is described as "wobbly" and "unstable" when used for heavier clothing.
• Height adjustment mechanism failure: The mechanism for adjusting the height is reported as unreliable, failing to hold the bars in place. Some users report needing to firmly tighten the adjustment. The height adjustment is described as inefficient, with bars only staying at the minimum height. One user reports the height adjustment mechanism as non-functional. At least one user experienced failure of the height adjustment mechanism preventing assembly.
• Instructions may be unclear: Some users found assembly difficult without clear instructions on properly securing the components (e.g., using a mallet).
• Missing parts: At least one user reported receiving the product with missing parts.
• Size smaller than expected: At least one user noted the size was smaller than expected compared to competitors. The length measurement is inaccurate according to one user, due to the protruding black connectors. One user notes the actual width is larger than advertised.
• Misleading Material Description: At least one user reported that the product is advertised as steel but is actually made of plastic.
• Inconsistent sturdiness: The reported sturdiness appears inconsistent across users, possibly due to assembly technique, variations in product quality, or user expectations.
• Wheels lack locking mechanism: Wheels move easily, even with slight contact.
• Weak wheels: At least one user describes the wheels as weak.

Comments

The product''s fragility and instability remain significant recurring concerns, despite positive reviews regarding ease of assembly, low price (especially when discounted), convenience, and capacity. The discrepancy between positive and negative reviews regarding sturdiness may indicate significant variation in product quality or assembly success. The need for a rubber mallet for assembly suggests a tight fit which might contribute to difficulties. The reported ability to hold heavy items appears highly dependent on specific configuration and weight distribution, with the likelihood of failure being high. Proper assembly is crucial, yet even then, failure is frequently reported. The bottom shelf remains a persistent problem, often detaching. The insufficient space between bars further limits functionality. Difficulty adjusting the height is also noted by some users. One user reports successfully using the rack for hanging plants, supporting a weight of 15kg per bar. The product is described as being advertised as steel, but is in fact made of plastic. The weak construction and instability are recurring themes, even when assembling multiple units. One user reported the need for additional support to prevent the rack from sliding apart. Reports of damaged products upon arrival are present. At least one user found the product less stable than expected. The product''s suitability for heavier items is questionable, and many report instability even with moderate weight. The product is described as a good solution for additional wardrobe space. The product is described as a good solution for those with limited space and/or who don''t want to install wall-mounted solutions. Some users report the product as being more stable after assembly than initially expected. Several users describe the product as holding a significant amount of clothing without instability.