JYSK ORMAR DAMHUS 149X174 TAMNO SIVA

JYSK ORMAR DAMHUS 149X174 TAMNO SIVA (1 / 7)

Not in stock

Average rating: 3.65
Reviews analyzed: 231

AI analyzed reviews and found:

Pros

  • Easy and quick to assemble (commonly mentioned).
  • Provides ample storage space for clothes and smaller items. Suitable for temporary storage or smaller clothing quantities (mentioned multiple times).
  • Good value for money (mentioned multiple times).
  • Convenient for those starting out in a new home or moving (mentioned once).
  • Easy to move around due to lightweight construction (mentioned once).
  • For some users, it functions adequately for its purpose, particularly for lightweight items or temporary storage (mentioned multiple times).
  • Stable for some users (mentioned multiple times). Specifically, the shoe version is described as very stable.
  • Described as spacious and practical (mentioned multiple times).

Cons

  • Extremely poor quality: The material is described as flimsy, fragile, and easily breaks/tears (extremely common). The metal bars bend easily, and plastic components are brittle (mentioned frequently). The connectors are also of poor quality (mentioned multiple times). The fabric covering is described as thin and easily rips or tears, even with minimal weight. Shelves are also reported to be weak and easily break. Some parts may arrive damaged, deformed, or missing (mentioned frequently). The fabric is also described as easily ripping with minimal contact. The fabric covering may shed dust-like particles. The fabric is also described as hard and unpleasant. The straps for tying are reported as weak and easily break. Corner pieces break during assembly. The metal frame is described as too thin.
  • Low weight capacity: The garment rack cannot support more than 5-6 garments without collapsing or bending (repeatedly mentioned). It is unsuitable for heavier items like jackets or coats (explicitly mentioned). Shelves also break easily under even moderate weight (mentioned multiple times). A weight limit of 3kg per shelf is explicitly mentioned. The structure is described as unstable and unsuitable for heavier items or long-term use (mentioned multiple times). Hanging tubes may bend under light weight. The central bar is not strong enough to hold more than 15 shirts or dresses.
  • Poor assembly instructions: Instructions are unclear and difficult to follow (mentioned twice). Some instructions may not clearly indicate the correct placement of shelves (mentioned once).
  • Short lifespan: Several reviews report the garment rack breaking or falling apart within months, sometimes even days (repeatedly mentioned). Reports exist of the fabric disintegrating within 6 months.
  • Some parts (e.g., connecting pieces, shelves, rods) may arrive deformed or missing (mentioned multiple times). Some users report needing to use additional materials like duct tape for repairs.
  • The zippers on the outer cover are described as inconvenient (mentioned once).

Comments

The majority of negative reviews cite the extremely poor quality of materials and construction as a major issue. The low weight capacity and short lifespan are significant drawbacks. While some users found it useful for temporary storage or lightweight items, many strongly advise against purchasing it due to its unreliability and tendency to break easily. The frequent arrival of damaged or missing components, unclear instructions, and lack of spare parts are additional drawbacks. The overall consensus is that this garment rack is not suitable for long-term use or storage of heavier items, though some users report satisfaction with the product for temporary or limited-use situations. There are reports of a chemical smell emanating from the fabric cover. The product''s suitability for use in dry environments (like panel apartments) is questioned due to fabric degradation. A user reported that despite purchasing three units, two arrived with missing parts. One user found it suitable as a travel garment rack.

Not in stock