JYSK PAVILJON JERUP Š270XD270 SIVA

Pros

• Easy assembly and disassembly: Commonly mentioned as quick and simple, often taking only 2-3 minutes for two people. One person can manage it, though it may be more challenging. Described as similar to opening an umbrella.
• Good value for money: Frequently praised for its affordability. One user mentioned it as a good option for €60 (assuming current exchange rate). Another mentioned a price of approximately €22 (based on 1750 CZK).
• Compact storage: Folds into a carrying bag, taking up minimal space when not in use.
• Stable with modifications: Users report increased stability after replacing the included stakes with stronger ones (e.g., rebar) and securing it to the ground using ropes and pegs.
• Sufficient size: Adequate for various uses, including hosting events. The 2.7m x 2.7m size is specifically mentioned.
• Good sun protection: Effectively shields from the sun.
• Attractive appearance: Described as "beautiful," "nice," "stylish," and having a "neat appearance".

Cons

• Poor structural integrity: Very frequently reported to be flimsy and easily damaged by wind or rain. The frame is a commonly cited weakness, breaking or bending easily even in moderate conditions. The material is often described as weak. Numerous users reported damage or breakage within weeks of purchase. One user reported a lifespan of only 3 weeks. The metal frame is described as thin and fragile. The included stakes are frequently cited as inadequate. Plastic connectors are described as fragile. Seams are reported to leak. The structure is described as collapsing like a "house of cards".
• Water leakage: The canopy is not waterproof and leaks in normal rain. Seams leak in heavier rain.
• Inadequate instructions: One review mentioned poorly written instructions.
• Inadequate stakes: The included stakes are consistently criticized for being too weak to provide adequate stability.

Comments

The Jerup pavilion''s susceptibility to wind and rain damage is a major recurring theme. While some users express satisfaction with its performance in calm conditions and suggest improvements like using stronger stakes or securing it to the ground, many others report significant structural failure in moderate winds or rain. The product appears suitable only for use in calm, dry weather. The lack of readily available replacement parts is also mentioned as a significant drawback. One review notes that side panels are no longer available. The poor quality of the included stakes and the fragile plastic connectors are frequently mentioned. The product''s failure even in light winds and rain is a significant concern raised in multiple reviews. Many users report receiving damaged or incomplete products. Several users received refunds due to structural failure or damage. The overall consensus highlights a significant discrepancy between the advertised product and the delivered quality, with the structure proving far less durable than expected, even in relatively mild conditions.