JYSK ORMAR MANDERUP 128X199 3 VRATA BOJA DIVLJEG HRASTA

Pros

• Good value for money: Frequently mentioned as offering excellent value, especially when purchased on sale.
• Spacious: Reviewers consistently praise the ample storage space and deep shelves. The internal layout is described as well-designed and efficient, even in the 120cm version.
• Robust and sturdy: Described as robust, solid, and heavy-duty, exceeding expectations in terms of quality. Multiple reviewers note the wardrobe is "not thin" and "massive". Reviewers describe the material as high quality and superior to competitors. The shelves are described as sturdy.
• Easy assembly (mostly): Many reviewers found assembly straightforward and easy, with clear instructions. Instructions are frequently praised for their clarity and detailed descriptions; one reviewer called the instructions "bomb". Numbered parts and bags of screws aid assembly. Parts are labeled with stickers. At least one reviewer found assembly simple even for a beginner.
• Attractive design: The wardrobe''s appearance is frequently praised as beautiful, elegant, and stylish. It is described as fitting various interior styles (e.g., boho loft, Mediterranean). The design is described as minimalist and stylish. Reviewers note that the wardrobe looks even better in person than in pictures.
• Well-designed: The internal layout and compartmentalization are considered functional and well-thought-out; the internal layout is described as practical and well-utilized space.

Cons

• Difficult assembly (some cases): Some reviewers found assembly challenging, particularly the final step of standing it upright (requiring two people), and reported minor damage during assembly (e.g., scratches). Inconsistent dimensions have been reported. One reviewer reported a discrepancy between advertised and actual dimensions resulting in a return. Missing screws and parts (hinges) reported in at least one instance. One reviewer reports difficulty attaching the doors due to unclear instructions and incorrectly numbered parts. Another reports that the instructions are logical but some steps are missing. The back panel warping is reported in at least one review. At least one reviewer recommends pre-assembling the doors before attaching the back panel. Assembly is reported as taking 2 hours with two people in one case. At least one reviewer describes the assembly instructions as hopeless and written for someone already familiar with the process.
• Door alignment issues: A recurring problem with door alignment and gaps. Some doors did not close properly and required adjustment or additional magnetic closers. Doors are described as more fragile than the frame. Minor imperfections like exposed nails have been noted. One review mentions that the doors are not properly joined at the corners and light can be seen between them. The foil on the doors may peel off at the corners. Difficulty adjusting the doors is frequently reported. In at least one case, the holes for the hinges were incorrectly drilled. One review mentions that the middle door is difficult to adjust to proper closure. In at least one case, the doors were mismatched (two items labeled "13" were different). Only three hinges were included in one case, resulting in the inability to install the doors. In at least one case, a door came damaged (slightly curved); in another, a door was installed backwards.
• Potential for damage during assembly: A few reviewers experienced minor scratches or damage during assembly, despite careful handling. One review mentioned damage upon arrival; another mentioned damage to a corner upon arrival. Poor packaging resulting in damage is mentioned in one review.
• Door fragility: The doors are described as thinner and more fragile than the frame, requiring careful handling.
• Strong smell (some cases): At least one review mentioned a strong odor persisting for multiple days. Another reported no unpleasant smell.
• Limited adjustability: Modifying the setup after assembly (e.g., removing a shelf) is reported as problematic because it could compromise the stability.
• Inconsistent dimensions: One reviewer reported a discrepancy between advertised and actual dimensions, leading to a return.
• Lack of lower drawer (in some versions): One reviewer wished a larger version had a lower drawer, a feature present in a smaller variant.
• Poor quality materials (some cases): At least one review describes the materials as cheap, made of newspaper-like material, and the back panel warping. Another reports issues with the adhesive on one of the shelves. At least one reviewer describes the material as particle board which is at risk in case of future dismantling. Some reviews note that the protective stickers are not the same color as the cabinet. The description of the material in some languages as "cellulose paper" imitating wood instead of melamine raises concerns about the accuracy of product descriptions. The particle board is described as weak in at least one review.
• Narrow shelves: At least one reviewer notes that the shelves are not wide enough and can slide off their supports if shifted.
• Short legs (some versions): At least one reviewer notes that the legs under the middle door are too short, leaving a gap between the bottom of the door and the floor.
• Dust: At least one reviewer noted that the parts were very dusty upon delivery.

Comments

The Manderup wardrobe receives largely positive feedback, primarily due to its spaciousness, attractive design, and perceived good value. However, inconsistencies in assembly ease and significant, recurring door alignment issues are major drawbacks. While many users report straightforward assembly, others experience significant challenges, particularly with the final upright stage and door alignment, requiring manual adjustment and potentially some carpentry skills. The need for two people for the final assembly step is frequently mentioned. Addressing door alignment problems through improved design or including magnetic closures would likely improve customer satisfaction significantly. Reported discrepancies in dimensions and assembly difficulties underscore the need for improved quality control and more precise product specifications. The inconsistencies in reported material quality indicate variability in manufacturing or material sourcing. The depth of the wardrobe may be unsuitable for people with broader shoulders, according to one review. Several reviews note the lack of options for longer clothing. Some reviewers suggest that assembly by a professional is recommended. At least one customer reported receiving only two parts of a three-part order. Another received a damaged door upon delivery. One reported missing parts (six hinges). The reported price varies, with at least one customer paying €269 and another €250.