JYSK NADMADRAC 80X200CM WELLPUR GULEN GT65 BIJELA

Pros

• Exceptional comfort and softness: Frequently described as "very soft," "like sleeping on clouds," "perfectly soft," "mekkoučké pohodlí" (very soft comfort), "omfavnet" (embraced), and "jätteskönt" (very nice). Reviewers frequently report improved sleep quality and relief from back pain, feeling completely relaxed and pain-free upon waking. Many highlight its ability to conform to the body and mold to the body shape. Multiple reviewers use superlatives like "best mattress ever" and "excellent".
• Good value for money: Many reviewers consider it good or excellent value, especially when purchased on sale (prices mentioned around €170-€300, depending on size and sale; also mentioned at around €200 after a discount from €500). One reviewer considered it good value for money even at a higher price. Another noted it as "very good for this (sale) price".
• Improved sleep quality: Reviewers reported improved sleep quality and relief from back pain, with some noting waking up feeling refreshed and relaxed. One reviewer mentioned it made their old bed feel updated. Many report waking up pain-free.
• Suitable for various body weights: While some found it too soft for their weight, others (up to 120kg) found it comfortable. One reviewer weighing over 100kg and 193cm tall found it perfect with a firm mattress underneath.
• Thick and supportive (for some): Some reviewers appreciated the mattress'' thickness and its ability to provide support. It is described as "chunky" and "meaty". One reviewer stated that while seemingly soft to the touch, it provides perfect support for a 120kg person.
• Improved comfort on old beds: Several reviewers specifically mentioned using the mattress topper on older, firmer beds, greatly improving their sleeping comfort. Many report it updating older beds.

Cons

• Excessive softness: This is a major recurring negative point. Many reviewers (especially those who sleep on their sides, stomach, or have back problems) found it far too soft, resulting in sinking, body impressions, a feeling of being stuck in a "hole" or "gulf", and morning aches (neck, back, shoulders). The mattress is described as not returning to its original shape quickly. Several reviewers mentioned pain in knees and back after using it. One reviewer said it is unsuitable for those with back, hip, or shoulder problems. Significant sinking is reported, preventing easy turning in bed and creating a feeling of being "stuck." One reviewer found it too soft, too hot and described the quality as poor. Another reported the mattress shrinking significantly after use. Another said it was too hard. Many describe sinking and difficulty turning over. Many report significant sinking in the middle, causing spinal misalignment.
• Poor quality: Some reviews mention poor quality materials, resulting in the mattress becoming lumpy and misshapen. One reviewer noted a noticeable lump inside the mattress. Long-term durability is questionable due to reported lump formation and loss of shape. Reports of lump formation after a few months. One reviewer noted that the quality has significantly decreased compared to an older model.
• Slipping: At least one reviewer mentioned the mattress frequently slipping out of place. Another described it as "sliding around" on the bed.
• Chemical smell: One reviewer reported a strong chemical odor that did not dissipate.
• Overly warm: One reviewer found the mattress too warm and encasing due to its construction.

Comments

The mattress''s softness remains the key differentiator in user experience. While many appreciate its plush feel, others find it excessively soft, resulting in discomfort and back pain. The firmness appears to be a matter of personal preference, strongly influenced by body weight, sleeping position, and underlying mattress firmness. The thickness is considerably thicker than it appears in pictures, according to one reviewer. Some reviewers experienced problems adjusting to the mattress due to its significant softness. Long-term durability remains uncertain based on noted loss of shape and lump formation in some users. Several reviewers highlighted a preference for a previous, thinner model from the same brand. One reviewer suggested buying two different ones based on individual preferences, although this may split the bed in two. The mattress may take a couple of days to fully expand after unpacking. Some reviewers experienced problems with the mattress cover making it difficult to put on fitted sheets. The mattress''s suitability depends heavily on individual preferences and existing mattress firmness. There are reports of the mattress becoming unusably lumpy after a few months of use. Some reviewers reported it being too hard initially, then softening over time. There are reports indicating that a previous version of this mattress was superior to the current model. Several reviewers noted that the firmness is uneven, with excessive sinking in some areas.