JYSK NADMADRAC 80X200 PLUS T50 DREAMZONE

Pros

• Comfort: Very commonly praised for comfort and significantly improving bed or sofa comfort. Many users report improved sleep quality and reduced back pain. Described as "very comfortable," "pleasant," "soft," providing a "good night''s sleep," and allowing users to sleep "on clouds" after an initial period of firmness. Frequently described as comfortable and easy to use on a sofa. Many users report the topper is great for back pain relief. Users describe it as unexpectedly comfortable. One user notes that the profiled side is particularly pleasant. Multiple reviews describe it as comfortable and convenient.
• Value for money (at reduced price): Very frequently mentioned as good value, especially when purchased on sale. Many reviews specifically state it''s good quality for the reduced price. Many describe it as a good purchase at a discounted price. Several users state they would not purchase at full price. Many describe the price-quality ratio as excellent. At least one user considers the price-quality ratio excellent. Several users found it good value for the money.
• Thin profile: Appreciated by several users for its thinness (3cm), suitable for those who don''t want a thick topper. Useful for bridging the gap between two mattresses or improving the comfort of a sofa. One user mentions it''s good for extending the life of an older mattress/sofa. Convenient for storage. The thin profile is considered a positive aspect by some. One user explicitly mentions ease of storage as a benefit.
• Washable cover: At least one user mentions the washable cover as a positive feature. Another user notes that the cover is washable up to 60°C. Another user highlights the easy maintenance thanks to the removable and washable cover.

Cons

• Inaccurate dimensions: A recurring issue is the topper''s dimensions being smaller than advertised, often significantly so (e.g., 10cm less in width). This problem appears across multiple sizes (90x200, 140x200, 160x200, 180x200) and is noted after the 48-72 hour expansion period, with some reporting discrepancies even after 72 hours. The reported thickness is also often less than advertised (2cm instead of 4cm, 3cm instead of 4cm). The discrepancy is sometimes attributed to the cover. One user reports the cover deforming the foam. Several users report the topper being thinner than advertised (e.g., only 2cm thick instead of 4cm). One user received a topper significantly smaller in width (4cm less). One user describes it as a thin sponge in a cover. Several users report the topper as much thinner than advertised. One user reports inconsistencies between online order and in-store product, noting differences in thickness, and the absence of anti-slip features.
• Firmness: At least one review describes the topper as too firm, exacerbating existing mattress issues. Another notes it''s of "medium quality" and thin. One user notes it''s initially a bit hard before softening. At least one user found it too hard and exchanged it for a different model. Another user describes it as too soft and uncomfortable, a waste of money. At least two users describe it as too hard. Another user describes it as not sufficiently soft.
• Quality concerns: One review mentions receiving a slightly soiled topper with stains. At least one review describes the topper as thin and not of high quality, not recommending it even at a discounted price (€60). One user describes it as a "cheap mat" rather than a topper. Another describes the quality as poor and the foam as thin. One user reports the cover becoming discolored from perspiration, and that after washing the cover, it no longer fits the topper. One user describes the topper as a wavy sponge in a cover and not of expected quality for the price. At least one user reports poor stitching on the cover. One user describes it as a simple, thin, and very soft sponge. Another user describes it as a thin, simple sponge.

Comments

The product''s dimensions are a major concern, with multiple reports of significant discrepancies between advertised and actual sizes. This issue persists even after the recommended 48-72 hour expansion period. Some users suggest measuring the product in-store before purchasing to avoid this problem. The cover seems to play a role in the sizing issue, as removing it helps (although this is not explicitly stated by all users). While the product is generally well-received for comfort, the inconsistencies in size and occasional quality problems diminish the overall experience for some buyers. Price seems to be a factor in the overall assessment, with many noting value for money at reduced prices. The firmness is described as variable; some find it appropriately soft while others find it too firm. The topper is frequently used to improve older mattresses or sofas, or to add comfort to existing mattresses. Several users highlight the convenience of the topper''s thin profile for storage. One user recommends purchasing the "Gold" version instead of this one for better elasticity. One user notes that it does not replace a new mattress, but improves the feel of an old one with dips. One user advises checking the product in-store before purchasing online to avoid discrepancies. Another user suggests it is suitable for covering older mattresses with damage or protruding springs but is less effective on top of orthopedic mattresses.