JYSK FLIS DEKA SKOGVIKKE 130X160 BIJELA

Pros

• Affordable: Frequently praised as inexpensive or a great value for the price. Multiple reviews mention purchasing multiple items (up to 70 in one case) due to the low cost. One review mentions a price of approximately €2.50 per item.
• Soft and cozy: Described as soft, cozy, comfortable, delicate, pleasant to the touch, super soft, and "finom pihe-puha" (very fine fluff-soft). The softness is a commonly mentioned positive attribute. Multiple reviews mention use for pets due to softness.
• Lightweight: Many reviews highlight the lightweight nature of the item. This is noted as advantageous for various uses.
• Versatile: Used for various purposes including as a throw blanket, cover for furniture (sofas, armchairs, etc.), pet bed cover, quilt backing, car seat protection, protection for canvas prints, part of a Christmas gift package, protection for white leather furniture, interlining for curtains, and as a cover for a heating pad. Also used for knitting blankets, lining guinea pig cages, and as chair covers at a wedding.
• Washable: At least one review mentions washing the item at 60°C without issues, despite a 40°C recommendation. Another review mentions easy washing and drying. Multiple reviews mention machine washing without shrinkage. Frequently praised for ease of washing and maintaining its condition after multiple washes.
• White color: The white color is specifically praised, mentioned as "really white," "beautiful," "pure white," and suitable for white interiors.

Cons

• Thin: A frequently recurring negative point. Described as thin, flimsy, almost transparent, and not suitable as a warm blanket. The thinness is often cited as a major drawback. Leads to significant creasing after drying, even on a crease-free setting. Some describe it as being too thin for intended use. Multiple reviews mention lack of sewn edges. One review describes it as allowing a finger to pass through.
• Low quality material: Several reviews mention the low quality of the material, described as artificial, poor quality, cheap, shedding excessively, feeling like artificial wool or cotton, and feeling like plastic. One review points out that the material is polyester, not plush as advertised. Multiple reports of significant pilling and shedding, especially in newer purchases. Some report defects such as holes in the fabric.
• Not suitable as a warm blanket: Explicitly stated to be insufficiently warm to use as a blanket for warmth. While some describe it as "warm," this is often in the context of a light cover or for use in warmer conditions.

Comments

The item''s thinness and low-quality material are significant factors determining its suitability. While praised for its affordability, softness, and versatility, its lightweight nature makes it unsuitable as a primary blanket for warmth. However, its suitability as a decorative item, furniture protector, pet bedding, or craft project material is frequently highlighted. The low price justifies its purchase for many users as a low-cost solution for various purposes. The quality is perceived as adequate considering the low price, although several users expressed disappointment in the material''s quality and shedding. The white color is a popular choice. Significant shedding and pilling reported in recent reviews negatively impact the overall perception of product quality, regardless of price. The lack of sewn edges is another common complaint. The thinness is described as a significant drawback in several reviews.