SAMSUNG GALAXY A556 A55 5G 8GB / 128GB

Pros

• Speed/Performance: Frequently described as fast, quick, responsive, and "shustrenkiy" (quick/nimble). Apps load quickly.
• Camera: Commonly praised for high-quality photos, vibrant and natural colors, ideal colors, "super" camera, and good video recording with stabilization. One user compared it favorably to an iPhone 12, while another found it superior to a Samsung A72. "Amazing camera," "fire camera," and "superb" camera were used.
• Build Quality: Described as sturdy, well-made, heavy (in a positive way), substantial, and having a premium feel. Materials are often mentioned as glass and metal. Manufacturing locations include Vietnam and India. Many note the phone feels expensive and high-quality.
• Sound: Loud and clear audio from speakers is frequently mentioned. Stereo speakers are noted in one review. Described as "bomb" speakers and excellent sound.
• Design/Appearance: The phone''s appearance is frequently praised, with mentions of attractive colors (specifically lavender with iridescent qualities) and a stylish, sleek design. However, one user noted the black bezel around the screen as too prominent. Many describe it as beautiful and "simpaticny" (pretty).
• Battery Life: While some users found the battery life to only last through a day of heavy use, others reported good battery life and fast charging (50% charge in half an hour). One user stated it lasted for several months of heavy use including accidental water exposure, suggesting good water resistance. One user reported it lasted for more than a day. Another reported good autonomy.
• Display: The screen is described as pleasant, with a user noting that their eyes feel relaxed. One user mentions a 120hz refresh rate.
• Other Features: Wireless data transfer, smart camera features, 256GB of memory, and eSIM support (dual online) are mentioned. One review specifically noted the phone felt like a flagship model. Contactless data transfer is mentioned.

Cons

• In-box Contents: The lack of a charger, screen protector, and case in the box is a commonly mentioned drawback. Users had to purchase these items separately. A user noted the inclusion of only a Type-C to Type-C cable as unhelpful.
• Battery Life: One user explicitly stated that the battery life was not as good as expected, only lasting through a day of active use. Another user noted that even in power saving mode, the battery was low by the end of the day. A third user reported the battery not lasting a full day.
• Camera (one instance): One user reported that, despite the generally positive feedback, the camera was not as good as their previous Samsung A72.
• Fingerprint Sensor: One user reported slow and unreliable fingerprint sensor performance, particularly during unlocking, although it worked fine within apps. The on-screen location was also cited as less convenient than a physical button.
• Software: One user noted that the software lacked several features compared to their previous phone (POCO X3) and found the menu and notification shade less convenient. The phone''s inability to simultaneously use Wi-Fi and mobile data was also mentioned. Power saving mode was reported as ineffective.

Comments

The phone''s size and weight are subjects of some comments. While some users found the phone''s weight to be a positive attribute, signifying quality, another user found it too large and heavy (referring to it as a "shovel"). The phone''s functionality is generally praised with one user stating it is a good option for those who don''t play games but require a reliable phone with a non-childish design. Several users confirmed receiving their phones with the original packaging intact and a battery charge between 50% and 51%, suggesting they received new, unopened units. Some users also mentioned the process of transferring data from older phones, with one user noting the need for a Micro USB to Type-C adapter for this purpose. Another user successfully performed a contactless data transfer. One user noted a data transfer from an A50 took 2.5 hours. The macro camera module was criticized as inferior to using a macro lens on the main camera. One user compared it favorably to a Samsung Galaxy S21 (though noting the S21 had a better camera and screen). A user mentioned purchasing the phone for their mother as a replacement for a Galaxy A35. Several users mentioned the phone''s value for money, especially when purchased on sale. One user noted the phone''s release date as February 2025. The phone''s suitability as a gift is mentioned several times.